Six lenses. One story at a time.
Facets examines public narratives through six interlocking analytical lenses. They aren't a verdict. They are a way to read, one designed to slow the moment between a story being told and the reader accepting it as true.
- 01
Framing
How presentation shapes interpretation.
Framing choices, like passive voice or distancing verbs, can move the actor out of the sentence and leave the reader uncertain who did what to whom.
Read Issue 01 through Framing → - 02
Archetypes
The roles people are cast into: hero, villain, victim, saviour.
Once cast, an archetype carries its own expectations. The 'ideal victim' must look a certain way to be believed; the 'hero cop' is treated as proof the system worked.
Read Issue 01 through Archetypes → - 03
Collective Belief
Shared assumptions presented as fact.
When a sentence treats a contested assumption as background fact, the reader inherits it without ever being asked to assess it.
Read Issue 01 through Collective Belief → - 04
Expectation
What the framing leads a reader to anticipate.
If a paragraph closes on a denial, an 'isolated incident' line or 'lessons learned', the reader is steered toward closure before evidence has been tested.
Read Issue 01 through Expectation → - 05
Themes
Recurring narrative patterns that give events moral shape.
Themes like DARVO, 'bad apples' or 'witch hunt' repeat across cases. Spotting them helps the reader recognise a pattern rather than a one-off story.
Read Issue 01 through Themes → - 06
Symbolism
Loaded imagery that carries meaning beyond surface fact.
Loaded words ('tragic', 'brutal', 'battling depression') colour an event before the facts arrive, and can convert preventable harm into fate or personal combat.
Read Issue 01 through Symbolism →
Test the lenses on your own text.
The Facets Checker runs a deterministic rule-set against any text you paste, and tells you which of the six lenses are firing and why.
Open the Facets Checker →